The officer's report doesn't dodge the harm. It accepts the scheme would cause "significant harm to the rural character and appearance" of the area by introducing major development on an undeveloped field, and finds it contrary to Local Plan policy LPRSP9 and NPPF policy N2(1)(a) on those grounds. But it assesses the harm as largely localised, since the site sits at the bottom of a scarp slope and is well screened, with amendments to the scheme - more landscaping and retained woodland in the north-east corner - reducing the risk of any long-range visual impact. The site is in Flood Zone 1 (low risk), sustainable drainage is proposed, and the scheme is expected to deliver a 10% biodiversity net gain through a mix of on-site measures and a Section 106 contribution. None of this, in the officer's assessment, is enough to outweigh the benefit of the homes themselves given the borough's housing shortfall. The same committee meets on a site that cuts the other way too: at the
former Jewson site on Buckland Hill, allocated for housing, officers are recommending it stay in commercial use instead, because no housebuilder has come forward for it.